Stereolithography (SLA) is a 3D printing technology that uses light to selectively cure a photosensitive resin, building objects layer by layer. Over the years, various SLA-related technologies have been developed, each with its own mechanism for curing the resin. Here's a rundown of the different types of SLA printers:
Laser SLA:
Principle: A UV laser beam is directed by galvanometers (or galvo mirrors) to trace and cure the resin in the desired pattern on each layer.
Advantages: High precision and detail.
Examples: Formlabs Form series, Peopoly Moai.
Digital Light Processing (DLP):
Principle: Uses a digital projector screen to flash a single image of each layer across the entire platform at once. Each flash cures a layer of resin.
Advantages: Generally faster than laser SLA because it cures an entire layer at once. Can achieve fine details.
Examples: Anycubic Photon, Elegoo Mars.
Continuous Liquid Interface Production (CLIP):
Principle: Introduced by Carbon3D, CLIP involves projecting light through an oxygen-permeable window into the resin. The window allows a thin uncured layer of resin to exist between the object and the window, enabling continuous growth of the object rather than the traditional layer-by-layer approach.
Advantages: Faster print speeds because it eliminates the need for the "peel" process between layers. Can produce smoother final parts.
Examples: Carbon M2.
Masked SLA (MSLA or LCD SLA):
Principle: Uses LCD panels with a UV LED backlight. The LCD mask lets UV light through in the shape of the layer, effectively "masking" where the UV light should not cure.
Advantages: Combines some benefits of DLP (curing entire layer at once) with potentially cheaper components.
Examples: Phrozen Sonic Mini, Anycubic Photon Mono.
Pivot SLA:
Principle: The build platform tilts or pivots slightly after each layer is cured, reducing the forces and potential suction issues that can occur during the peel process in traditional SLA printing.
Advantages: Reduces potential for print failures due to suction or adhesion issues.
Examples: Fewer commercial examples, but it's a concept that's been explored by the community.
All of these SLA-related technologies produce parts with high surface finish and detail compared to many FDM/FFF techniques. However, they tend to have smaller build volumes and require more post-processing (cleaning, curing, support removal). The choice between them typically comes down to the specific requirements of a project, such as print speed, detail level, material properties, and budget.